BNP Paribas’ €14.5 Bn Acquisition of Fortis Bank (BE, LU)
The crisis-era power play that led collapse to consolidation.
Deal Overview:
Acquirer: BNP Paribas
Target: Fortis Bank Belgium and Fortis Bank Luxembourg
Total Transaction Size: €14.5 billion
Closed Date: May 2009
BNP Paribas’ acquisition of Fortis marked one of the most pivotal transactions of the 2008 global financial crisis. At a time when trust in European banking was deteriorating and capital markets had seized up, the French banking giant seized an opportunity to acquire a distressed but strategically valuable retail banking franchise at a heavily discounted valuation. With Fortis hampered by its poorly timed ABN AMRO deal and the freezing of capital markets, BNP Paribas stepped in to stabilise the Belgian banking system and expand its market share across the Benelux region.
The deal was structured as a direct acquisition, with BNP using a combination of cash and equity to purchase the controlling stakes from the Belgian and Luxembourg governments, which had nationalised Fortis days earlier. BNP issued shares to the Belgium state, preserving cash and reinforcing capital buffers amid market turbulence. The acquisition was fast tracked due to the urgent need for market stability but faced legal pushback from Fortis shareholders, which delayed closing until a revised agreement was approved in April 2009. The transaction propelled BNP Paribas to its position as a leader in the European banking market, adding over €250 billion in customer deposits and pushing its retail business into two new domestic markets. After the deal was complete, BNP Paribas Fortis became Belgium's largest bank, contributing substantially to the group’s profitability and reinforcing confidence in European cross border consolidation.
The deal illustrates how a well-capitalised, strategic acquisition can transform a discounted purchase into long-term shareholder value while averting systemic collapse. From the motivations behind the acquisition and deal structuring under time sensitive conditions, to the integration process and post-merger performance, this report outlines how a eurozone leader was created through swift action, disciplined governance, and a clear strategic alignment.
Company Overview: Acquirer – BNP Paribas
Founded: 2000
LTM Revenue: €29.5 Bn
CEO: Baudouin Prot
Market Cap: €37.6 Bn
History & Background
2000: BNP and Paribas merger took place to form the modern company and one of the largest banks in Europe
2006: Acquired Banca Nazionale del Lavoro for €9 billion, expanding Italian presence
2009: Acquired 75% of Fortis bank in Belgium and an additional 16% in Luxembourg for €14.5 billion, establishing the subsidiary BNP Paribas Fortis
BNP Paribas can be traced back to two major French banks. Banque de Paris et des Pays-Bas (Paribas) which was established in 1872 and was mainly focused on investment banking; and Banque Nationale de Paris (BNP), which was established in 1966, through a merger of Banque Nationale pour le Commerce et l’lndustrie (BNCI) and Comptoir National d’Escompte de Paris (CNEP). Initially state-owned BNP was a key financier during France’s post war industrial expansion, until it was privatised, being listed as a public company on the Paris Stock Exchange in 1996. The two banks converged when BNP launched a hostile takeover bid for both Paribas and Société Générale. Although the takeover of Société Générale was not successful, BNP did complete the takeover of Paribas, with the two merging to form BNP Paribas in 2000. This created one of Europe’s banking powerhouses with a competitive business model across both retail and investment banking.
Target Overview
Founded: 1990
Net Income: - €20.6 billion
CEO: Filip Dierckx
Market Cap: c. €45.7 billion
History & Background
1990: Formed through merger of Dutch insurer AMEV/VSB and Belgian insurer AG group
1998: Acquired Generale Bank for an undisclosed amount, making it a major player in the Benelux banking sector
2007: Participated in the acquisition of ABN AMRO with RBS and Santander – this deal strained its financial stability
2008: Faced severe liquidity issues, leading to partial nationalisation and the sale of its banking operations to BNP Paribas
2010: The remaining insurance operations were rebranded as Ageas, ending the standalone Fortis name
Fortis was created in 1990 through the merger of AMev/VSB and AG Group, forming one of the first cross border financial services groups in Europe. Fortis pushed for growth through acquisitions, including acquiring Generale Bank – the largest bank in Belgium at the time. However, in 2007 it overstretched its ambition, participating in a three-way takeover to acquire ABN AMRO for €70 billion – the largest bank takeover in history at the time. Fortis funded this though short-term debt and asset sales, which, when the financial crisis came a year later, led to significant liquidity stress.
Strategic Direction
The acquisition of Fortis aimed to stabilise Fortis’s operations and expand BNP Paribas’s presence in the Benelux region. Fortis had strong retail and SME services in the Benelux region, an area BNP Paribas had limited exposure to before the deal. The integration focused on consolidating retail and corporate banking services, utilising BNP Paribas’s global infrastructure to enhance service offerings in the Benelux region. BNP Paribas integrated Fortis into its centralised systems, generating cost saving synergies and harmonising the two’s products to expand cross selling opportunities, particularly in private banking, insurance, and corporate lending.
Motivation
Fortis had no realistic path to fixing its liquidity issues once short-term markets froze during the 2008 financial crisis. Its capital was depleted by the acquisition of ABN Amro deal, a €70 billion deal completed just before the crisis broke out. Fortis had financed much of that acquisition with short-term debt and disposal of assets, making it vulnerable to liquidity stress. Therefore, a swift sale to a well-capitalised peer like BNP Paribas represented the most efficient and least disruptive resolution. It preserved customer confidence, maintained banking functions, and avoided asset liquidation factors which would have contributed to further destabilisation of the European banking system. BNP offering favourable terms even at a discounted price meant that not only was there an opportunity to keep its business running, but it was a rational and stable deal that supported both the bank and the wider Benelux and European economy.
Motivation
In the mists of the global financial crisis, BNP saw an opportunity to acquire an established, but liquidity stressed retail franchise at a discounted price, giving it exposure to the Benelux region – a market with higher propensity to save. BNP Paribas’s announcements at the time stressed that Fortis Belgium & Luxembourg would “add two new domestic markets” to France and Italy and propel it to the largest deposit bank in the euro-zone. This coupled with the discounted price made it a very attractive deal for BNP to pursue.
The Belgian government had already nationalised Fortis which would have taken away Fortis’ power to negotiate a more favourable price – at the time the Belgian government’s only goal was to provide stability to its financial markets, not to maximise a sale price. Therefore, when BNP bought 75% for €14.5 billion, it represented a fraction of the book value at the time. This supports academic evidence such as Shleifer & Vishny’s fire-sale theory which shows how deep discounts arise when distressed sellers face few unconstrained buyers (Shleifer and Vishny, 2011). They found that during distressed periods, there was significant discount on business assets – in the airline industry distressed airlines’ planes were sold for 10%-20% lower than non-distressed airlines’; distressed real estate followed a similar trend with discounts on average of around 27%.
While a discounted price was a strong motivation for BNP to pursue the deal, the operational synergies involved also contributed. Study into European bank mergers with complementary retail franchises show that these deals can deliver operating cost gains two to three years after completion (Campa & Hernando, 2006). This supported BNP’s view at the time, with company slides at the time aiming for €900 million in annual cost savings and revenue synergies by integrating Fortis’s retail banking network. It also supported the Belgian government’s goal of stability: “In the case of targets, there is a significant post-merger improvement in ROE following the transaction… on the order of 6% to 7% and it becomes significant two years after the completion of the deal” (Campa & Hernando, 2006)
Deal Navigation
The biggest challenge posed during this deal was the global financial crisis of 2008 – at the time this was one of the most unprecedented and damaging periods to financial markets, threatening the future of multiple established companies, but also threatening the future of the entire global financial markets.
Valuation
The valuation of Fortis was deeply impacted by the market conditions at the time. BNP offered €14.5 billion for 75% of Fortis Bank Belgium and an additional 16% of Fortis Bank Luxembourg, a figure which was below Fortis’s pre-crisis book value (FT, 2008). This lower valuation highlights the urgency of the transaction at the time – traditional methods of valuing M&A transactions would simply not have given an accurate valuation due to the unprecedented market conditions at the time. While you could argue that asset valuations could still have been relatively accurate, in Fortis’s case they had just lost €5.1 billion (FT, 2008) and were dependent on state support, so naturally their assets would already be at a discounted price, and more importantly, many buyers did not have the liquidity available to purchase them. This is supported by other deals at the time such as Bank of America’s purchase of Merrill Lynch and Lloyd’s rescue of HBOS, which saw similar valuation discounts of 40%-70% from pre-crisis values. Therefore, BNP’s offer, although low, was fair given the crisis’s effect on valuations of similar banks at the time. The market was very much in a period of turbulence, so fire sale prices were very much in effect. Laeven and Valencia (2013) further demonstrate that fire sales are integral to systemic banking crises and justify rapid interventions to preserve franchise value (p. 236).
Due Diligence
Due diligence around the deal at the time was accelerated and incomplete in comparison to normal conditions - Fortis’ exposure to US subprime related assets was a concern and could have catalysed further issues for the bank as the crisis worsened. In addition, Fortis still had unsettled liabilities from the ABN Amro acquisition that need to be resolved. To address these, BNP secured state guarantees to get partial state indemnities for certain “bad” assets, as well as reorganisation protections if future hidden liabilities emerged, mitigating the balance sheet uncertainty. Duchin and Sosyura (2014) argue that “state guarantees facilitate acquisitions by compensating for information asymmetries under crisis conditions.” (p 650). This strategic use of government backing allowed BNP to proceed despite incomplete information.
Deal Structure
The transaction was structured as a direct acquisition, not a merger, following the nationalisation of Fotis by the Belgian and Luxembourg governments. BNP used a mix of cash and share exchanges, with the Belgian state receiving BNP shares as part of the consideration, helping BNP to limit its cash drain. The use of equity financing avoided adding leverage during a fragile period for funding markets, simplifying the transaction compared to LBO type structures used in pre-crisis M&A.
Negotiations
The negotiations were politically and legally fraught with shareholders initiating a lawsuit alleging that fortis was undervalued (WSJ, 2009). With a Belgium court ruling in favour of the shareholders rights, it forced BNP and the governments to renegotiate the deal in early 2009. The renegotiated terms allowed a shareholder vote over the structure of the deal, which was eventually approved by a narrow margin in April 2009. The stall and subsequent vote over the deal structure caused major delays in the deal process, delaying progress for around 6 months.
Financing & Regulatory Approvals
BNP financed the deal by issuing new equity to the Belgian State, allowing BNP to prevent liquidity issues and strengthen its post-deal balance sheet. The response from Europe’s regulatory environment was supportive, with the EU Competition Commission approving the deal swiftly. The transaction was seen as stabilising the market rather than harming competition at the time (European Commission, 2009), with only minor divestments required to ensure compliance with competition laws. This aligns with Gropp and Heider’s (2010) findings that “Cross-border bank M&A during crises are more likely to gain regulatory approval when they reduce systemic risk and strengthen funding bases.” (p 90). Presenting a valuable insight into why the regulatory process was quick and supportive of the deal at the time.
Closing
The closing of the deal was delayed by 6 months as mentioned earlier due to the shareholder litigation relegations. After the final shareholder vote in April 2009, the transaction closed successfully in May 2009 without any further disruptions.
Integration
BNP Paribas’ acquisition of Fortis in 2008 marked one of the largest cross-border bank rescues during the global financial crisis. The post deal integration of Fortis into BNP’s operation was methodical, cautious, and focused on both operational synergies and reputational repair. Fortis was rebranded to BNP Paribas Fortis and integrated its systems and governance structure with BNP’s centralised model but did so without dismantling Fortis’ retail franchise or alienating its existing customer base. While the integration avoided major public missteps, cultural friction between the Paris based parent and the Belgium unit occasionally emerged. This did not overshadow the absence of major IT, client, or regulatory issues post-merger, suggesting a well-executed integration.
Financial Performance
Financial data from BNP Paribas post-acquisition indicates the integration met its cost and revenue synergy targets. Some key highlights:
Cost Synergies: €500 million in annual cost reductions were targeted, largely through system rationalisation, office closures, and procurement efficiencies
ROE: BNP’s ROE recovered from 6.2% in 2009 to 9.8% in 2011, suggesting that the Fortis deal did not dilute returns.
Net Income: Group net income rose from €5.8 billion (2009) to €6.05 billion (2011) despite wider eurozone stress after the financial crisis.
Cost-to-income ratio: The ratio improved from 68% pre deal to approximately 62% by 2011, reflecting improved operational efficiency from integrated systems.
Although BNP did not disclose detailed EPS accretion figures specific to the deal, consensus analyst estimates published in 2009 projected neutral to positive EPS impact by 2010.
Strategic Moves
Beyond operational metrics, BNP made several key qualitative and strategic moves to ensure integration success. Some key highlights:
Retention of key talent: BNP made deliberate efforts to retain Fortis’ senior leadership and relationship managers and helped preserve client continuity. This was an important move, especially in corporate and private banking where relationships are vital in the success of the bank.
Public communication strategy: To counter scepticism in Belgium, BNP launched a coordinated PR campaign assuring stakeholders of its long-term commitment to the region, including employment and investment pledges.
Regulatory cooperation: BNP maintained close alignment with the Belgian and Luxembourg governments and regulators, which was crucial for political acceptance and license retention.
These moves contributed significantly to stakeholder trust and reduced post-merger friction.
Outcome
Post-acquisition Fortis’ banking operations were integrated into BNP Paribas, forming the subsidiary BNP Paribas Fortis which it operates under in Belgium. BNP Paribas Fortis offers retail, corporate, and private banking in addition to asset management services. The deal was effective in stabilising Fortis’ operations, preserving the Belgian banking system, and creating the largest deposit bank in the eurozone by 2010. BNP Paribas Fortis emerged as a dominant force in Belgium, with a +25% retail market share and +€250 billion in customer deposits, meaning that the deal was successful for both sides with BNP boosting its market share, and the Belgian government having a stable financial landscape. This aligns with the ECB (2021) findings that cross-border banking mergers promote financial stability when strong capital buffers are maintained post completion.
Industry Impact
BNP Paribas’ acquisition of Fortis had a ripple effect in the broader European financial sector. The transaction demonstrated the feasibility of cross-border mergers during a crisis era, even under strict regulatory oversight. It provided a blueprint for stabilising important financial institutions without resorting to full nationalisation, an expensive and politically unpopular move for governments to undertake. Finally, it elevated BNP to leading status within European banking, particularly in retail and SME across the Benelux region. The successful stabilisation of Fortis also contributed to broader confidence in the European banking system during a period of extraordinary uncertainty. Without this deal we could have seen similar cascading failures to those in the US with Lehman Brothers. Fortis had around €300 billion in customer deposits across the region, which if a collapse was imminent, could have caused widespread panic and bank runs. This could have triggered reassessment of bank solvency, spread panic to other institutions that were also holding on, and undermined confidence in sovereign backstops. Therefore, BNP’s acquisition may have prevented a much larger and more long-term damaging crisis in financial markets across the Eurozone.
Great Success / Resounding Failure
The integration of Fortis int BNP Paribas’ structure generated substantial value across financial, operational, and strategic aspects. Post deal improvements in loan and deposit spreads across Belgium retail operations led to an increase in residual income, indicating stronger profitability after accounting for the cost of equity. The deal also boosted ROIC which rebounded above pre-deal benchmarks by 2012, aided by targeted reallocation of capital and performance-driven asset management. The acquisition enabled BNP to cross-sell insurance, private banking, and corporate finance services to Fortis clients, boosting revenue per customer. The integrated Fortis entity served as a catalyst for regional expansion and deeper penetration into Northern European retail and SME segments. Laeven and Valencia (2013) note that state-supported distressed mergers can result in long-term net value creation when integration is well governed. This correlates to the benefits BNP felt post-merger due to its very conscious effort to make sure the integration of Fortis was as efficient as possible.
The House View
The BNP Paribas Fortis transaction stands out as a model case in strategic, well executed crisis-era acquisitions. BNP took advantage of opportunistic pricing, fast but structured regulatory coordination, and efficient integration. Where some acquisitions falter due to cultural mismatch or rushed consolidation, BNP Paribas balanced independence with alignment. Some of the key lessons learned from the deal are as follows:
Crisis conditions can enable high value acquisitions, but only if the acquirer is well capitalised and trusted by regulators.
Cultural integration is not secondary – BNP succeeded by decentralising control and maintaining Fortis’ branding.
Governance continuity post-deal was essential to avoid regulatory backlash and public distrust.
The Fortis acquisition not only elevated BNP Paribas’ status as a European powerhouse bank but also helped to prevent a systemic banking collapse in Belgium. This deal remains a benchmark for post crisis consolidation and strategic banking M&A.
References
Bousquent, J .(2017): ‘Synergies Valuation in M&A’. Available at: https://www.afte.com/sites/default/files/inline-files/M%C3%A9moire%20du%203e%20prix%20-%20BOUSQUET%20Julien.pdf?utm
BNP Paribas (2008): 2008 Registration Document and Annual Financial Report. Available at: https://rates-globalmarkets.bnpparibas.com/documents/legaldocs/index_files/Resource_027.pdf?utm
BNP Paribas (2024) BNPP Q4 Annual Results 2024. Available at: https://cdn-group.bnpparibas.com/uploads/file/PR_BNPP_4Q_Annual_Results_2024_EN.pdf
BNP Paribas (2024) Results and Publications. Available at: https://invest.bnpparibas/en/results
BNP Paribas (2025) Results and presentations. Available at: https://invest.bnpparibas/en/results
BNP Paribas (2008): Second Update to the 2008 Registration Document and Semi Annual Financial Report. Available at: https://invest.bnpparibas/en/document/2nd-update-of-the-registration-document-5?utm
BNP Paribas (2024) Strategic priorities & key strengths for the new phase of the economic cycle. September. Available at: https://invest.bnpparibas/document/conferences-de-septembre-2024-strategic-priorities-key-strengths-in-the-new-phase-of-the-economic-cycle
Campa, J.M. & Hernando (2006) ‘M&As performance in the European financial industry’ Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(12), pp. 3367–3392. Available at: https://scispace.com/pdf/m-as-performance-in-the-european-financial-industry-pcvlvgon34.pdf
Duchin, R. and Sosyura, D. (2012) ‘The politics of government investment’, SSRN Working Paper Series. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1925710
European Central Bank (2024) Financial Stability Review. Available at: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/financial-stability-publications/fsr/html/index.en.html
European Commission (2009) Mergers: Commission approves BNP Paribas’ acquisition of Fortis Bank Belgium, 3 March. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_09_369
Fortis (2008): Fortis Financial Statements 2008. Available at: https://www.depremievergelijker.nl/jaarverslagen/2008/Jaarverslag-Fortis-2008.pdf
Financial News London (2024) BNP Paribas deal to give AXA Investment Managers the scale it needs to compete. Available at: https://www.fnlondon.com/articles/bnp-paribas-deal-to-give-axa-investment-managers-the-scale-it-needs-to-compete-b08c93e4
Financial Times (2024) BNP Paribas: Strategic transformation post-crisis. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/c2156850-8633-4a84-aa3d-061cb224ffa9
Financial Times (2008) BNP Paribas to acquire 75% of Fortis Belgium, 6 October. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/28236be5-8bc8-3179-adb1-e624c5dc2aa9
Gropp, R. and Heider, F. (2010) ‘The determinants of bank capital structure’, Review of Finance, 14(4), pp. 587–622. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/rof/article-abstract/14/4/587/1588156
Laeven, L. and Valencia, F. (2013) ‘Systemic banking crises database’, IMF Economic Review, 61(2), pp. 225–270. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/imfer.2013.12
Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (2011) ‘Fire sales in finance and macroeconomics’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(1), pp. 29–48. Available at: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.25.1.29
Wall Street Journal (2009) Fortis Shareholders Approve Revised Sale, 28 April. Available at: https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB124092136392563409